Hooked on Ebonics...doesn't work for me.




“You talk like a white girl.” “You trying to act white.”

For some reason, many black people have come to adopt the notion that we as a race speak improper English; that if you don’t add enough ain’t’s, imma’s, skreets, skraights, and skrimps to your speech, you are indeed acting or speaking “white.” Being that I’ve always been a target of this claim, I have always felt offended and quite frankly, put in a box, with this type of thinking. For me, it limits what is considered “black,” and what is considered “white.” It stereotypes. It produces shortcomings. It automatically sets up a hierarchy when it comes to language…black people speak poor English and whites speak proper English. Why does my English have to be poor? Can’t I be proper?

Of course, this is in reaction to the new Drug Enforcement Agency undertaking where they are attempting to hire nine Ebonics speakers in order to solve drug and criminal investigations. I have a problem with this. If blacks cannot agree on what is “black” and “white” in language, amongst many other things, how can we come to define Ebonics as African-American Vernacular English(the term that is being used)? So all of a sudden we have a language that is not used or recognized by all of its members? I think not.

The term “Ebonics,” became widely recognized in 1996, when the Oakland school board attempted to write a resolution that would allow instruction to be given in Ebonics and English. Upon my research, I found that Ebonics was not and is not simply considered slang, but it is actually being presented as though it is a language of the African-American community. Apparently African-Americans are “biologically predisposed toward a particular language through heredity.” I guess genetics has contributed to me throwing all of my words together, cutting off my sentences, and adding a “know what I’m sayin’” at the end. The Oakland schools were even trying to consider English as a second language (ESL) endorsement for teachers who were “bilingual.” Come on. While I appreciate someone attempting to legitimize the way we speak behind closed doors, but not really, I’ll pass.

And now the DEA wants to hire Ebonics experts. This step would actually “legitimize” Ebonics as a language, coincidentally confirming the idea that all or most African-Americans speak something other than English. I guess maybe we should have hillbilly experts, or perhaps valley girl or surfer dude experts as well. When teachers have conferences, they’ll need translators for Spanish-speaking people, as well as black folks. When parents schedule their conferences, they’ll need to decide whether or not they need a translator present for the meeting, for those unfamiliar English terms.

In case I was unclear, I don’t like this idea. It will inevitably have a serious backlash against the African-American community. “They talk so bad, they need translators.” “They’re so different, they have their own language.” The thing is, it would be recognized as a “language,” but definitely not given legitimacy. A person speaking Ebonics will still be seen as an ignorant person, with non-standard, lazy speech. This is more than just an aid to the DEA, it’s an open door for controversy, discrimination, and continued separation.

6 comments:

Unknown said...

the problem isn't ebonics, per se. the problem is plain old white supremacy. for example, obama must of necessity not have a "negro dialect", but its ok for MS governor Haley Barbour to speak like a bait and tackle salesman. Quite frankly, they both deviate sharply from standard english (as we've come to understand it from the Brits). One is acceptable in the public sphere, one isn't.

August 27, 2010 at 11:52 AM
Anonymous said...

From thе perspective of the local seаrch engіnе rankingѕ mаrketing expеrt to be able tо get the most οut of your articleѕ.
Be the pioneer іn your field anԁ try to negоtiate
а tradеoff if they agree tο mentіon you in their posts or articles.
Ӏn ѕummаry, bοth meta kеyworԁ and content dеsсriptions
havе thеіr рlace
in рrint and еlеctronic forms.
Andуou neеd to ensure that the seаrch engine aware
of the latеѕt informаtіon.
A Local Ѕearсh Еngine Ranκings articlе writing.


My web site; paleo kits

April 11, 2013 at 2:32 AM
Anonymous said...

As the main rationale for the paleo, some alcoholic beverages are still allowed.
Excel seems similarly gimped, though it's still typical for me to throw out my remaining grains and get started. Place cabbage on a piece of fruit in sight. Forward-Looking StatementsThis press release contains" forward-looking" statements within the meaning of Section 27 A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. We found that with the same old lettuce with the same old fruit cut up in a bowl?

My web-site: detox

April 17, 2013 at 8:25 PM
Anonymous said...

adasd

August 26, 2019 at 8:09 PM
Milly said...

It isn't about "slang being seen as a language" No, it is about how people from a specific culture speak. Yes, we use Ebonics. The fact that you slander a community for something they CANNOT change. It is not about genetics (obviously) it is about the culture & community where you grew up from. It isn't SLANG it isn't "not speaking properly" and it isn't "talking ghetto" It simply is dialect aka Ebonics. But i guess black people cant be anything except what White america is.
So are southerners and they're southern accents "ghetto" or "improper" NO. But when it comes to black people speaking Ebonics it is... Why? Because people like you validate this because someone offended you by saying you "talking white"... Why not take that opportunity to educate black people on how there is no "correct way to speak English" rather than invalidate Ebonics. (jameelahlester@yahoo.com)

February 29, 2020 at 11:20 AM
Unknown said...

wooow

February 9, 2022 at 10:31 PM

Post a Comment